Preserve the product
Keep the product, packaging, warnings, manuals, receipts, photos, serial numbers, and broken parts if it is safe to do so.
Call Before The Product Is Repaired, Discarded, Or Sent Back
Tell us what product failed, who made or sold it, where it is now, and what injuries followed. Product cases often depend on preserving the item before anyone changes it.
A product injury claim needs evidence that a defect or another legally actionable failure caused the injury. The product, warnings, instructions, maintenance history, and how it was used can matter. Keep the product and broken parts if it is safe to do so; a recall alone does not prove your case.
Keep the product, packaging, warnings, manuals, receipts, photos, serial numbers, and broken parts if it is safe to do so.
Design defect, manufacturing defect, warning defect, instruction failure, recall, and negligent maintenance are different proof paths.
It costs nothing to find out where you stand.
Product liability claims can turn on the actual product, warnings, manuals, recalls, maintenance, prior incidents, photos, purchase records, and expert inspection. Once the product is repaired or discarded, the case can become much harder.
Secure the item, parts, packaging, manuals, serial numbers, photos, and chain of custody.
Design, manufacturing, guard, recall, instruction, warning, compliance, and actual-knowledge issues.
Manufacturer, rental company, maintenance provider, employer, property owner, and any distributor or retailer with an independent legal duty.
Burns, amputations, TBI, spinal injury, wage loss, future care, scarring, and technical expert proof.
Start with when and where you were hurt, your injuries, and your main concern. You do not need every record before you call.
We ask about the people involved, any letters or offers you received, and information that could affect the next step.
We explain whether we may be able to help, what information is still needed, and what representation would involve.
A consultation does not commit you to hiring us. Representation begins only after conflict review and a written engagement agreement.
The cases. The work.
The difference it made.
$957K
Our client suffered brain damage in a case involving negligence by a corporation.
$425K
The case involved a medical transport provider’s failure to secure a scooter inside its van.
$5.2M
A teacher suffered brain and spinal injuries when a Detroit city van hit his stopped car. The City offered $25,000 before trial; a Wayne County jury awarded $5.2 million.
In their own words. Read what clients and families say about working with our team.
We have not gone to trial yet, but for the past 2 years I wouldn't choose anyone else to stand behind me and my child. If you want injury lawyers and team members who actually care, CHOOSE Christopher Trainor.
Dealing with insurance companies and medical billing is always a pain in the but and didn’t want anyone taking advantage of me and my situation. This team is number 1 in my book.
I recently had the pleasure of working with Chris Trainor, Amy DeRouin and their dedicated team regarding two personal claims. I cannot recommend them highly enough! From our very first consultation, it was clear that I was in capable and caring hands. I would trust them with any personal legal matter.
Focus On Your Recovery. Get Help With Your Claim.
Treatment, bills, and insurance questions can arrive at once. We can review your situation and explain how legal help may fit into your recovery.
Use this practical screen to identify the first product liability facts, records, and legal questions worth reviewing. It does not calculate a deadline. No sign-up and no dollar estimate. Your answers are only included if you submit the free case review below. The result is general information, not legal advice.
Question 1 of 5
Share what happened, how it has affected you, and a phone number or email where we can reach you. You can ask for a review before you have every report or insurance document.
The main point: preserve the product before anyone repairs, returns, alters, or discards the evidence.
The first job is usually to keep the product intact and identify everyone who designed, made, sold, rented, or changed it.
We review recalls, warnings, instructions, prior incidents, purchase records, and manufacturer responsibility.
We review workers comp, product defects, guards, maintenance, rental records, and third-party defendants.
We review crash evidence, recalls, component preservation, black-box data, and expert inspection.
We review origin and cause, product design, warnings, recalls, code issues, and long-term damages proof.
Michigan product liability cases can involve definitions in MCL 600.2945, production-defect and compliance issues, warning and alteration defenses, caps or limitations, comparative fault, workers’ compensation overlap, and expert causation proof.
MCL 600.2945 frames key product-liability definitions used in Michigan claims.
MCL 600.2946(2) generally requires proof that a practical and technically feasible alternative production practice was available, would have prevented the harm without significantly impairing usefulness or desirability, and would not have made the product materially more expensive.
Warning, alteration, misuse, sophisticated-user, and seller-liability defenses require fact-specific review. A nonmanufacturer seller generally needs its own reasonable-care/implied-warranty breach or express warranty.
CPSC, NHTSA, manufacturer notices, prior incidents, and technical service materials can support defect investigation.
Ordinary injury timing, workers’ compensation, motor-vehicle No-Fault, government defendants, and wrongful death may add separate rules.
Meet by phone, video, or at any of our Michigan offices.
Every case at Christopher Trainor & Associates is a team effort. Our attorneys collaborate on strategy, discovery, and litigation so you get the full strength of the firm behind you—not just a single lawyer. We have built our practice on this collaborative model since 1989.
Meet Our Attorneys