Workers comp is usually first
MCL 418.131 often makes workers’ compensation the exclusive remedy against an employer, but not necessarily against other responsible parties.
Call Before The Injury Is Treated As Only A Workers Comp Claim
Tell us where the construction injury happened, who controlled the site, what equipment or contractor was involved, and whether workers’ compensation has started. We will look for potential responsible parties.
The employer claim and the third-party claim are different. Missing that distinction can leave real money and accountability untouched.
MCL 418.131 often makes workers’ compensation the exclusive remedy against an employer, but not necessarily against other responsible parties.
Other contractors, site owners, drivers, equipment manufacturers, and product companies may be legally responsible outside workers comp depending on control, causation, and the facts.
The employer claim and the third-party claim are different. Missing that distinction can leave real money and accountability untouched.
Construction injuries often involve workers’ compensation and a separate third-party claim. General contractors, subcontractors, property owners, equipment companies, drivers, and product defendants may each need review.
It costs nothing to find out where you stand.
Construction injuries often involve workers’ compensation and a separate third-party claim. General contractors, subcontractors, property owners, equipment companies, drivers, and product defendants may each need review.
Medical treatment, wage loss, injury notice, provider choice, restrictions, and disputed causation.
General contractor, subcontractors, property owner, site safety plans, contracts, and work sequencing.
Scaffolds, ladders, cranes, lifts, tools, machines, guards, warnings, and maintenance records.
Pain and suffering, full wage loss, future care, disability, scarring, and family impact beyond comp benefits.
Medical treatment, wage loss, injury notice, provider choice, restrictions, and disputed causation.
General contractor, subcontractors, property owner, site safety plans, contracts, and work sequencing.
Scaffolds, ladders, cranes, lifts, tools, machines, guards, warnings, and maintenance records.
Pain and suffering, full wage loss, future care, disability, scarring, and family impact beyond comp benefits.
These matters involved premises, corporate-negligence, and serious-injury claims. We do not present them as construction-accident results. Past results do not guarantee a future result.
Actual review excerpts about injury representation, communication, medical-bill pressure, and support. The page-specific claim still depends on its own evidence, law, and deadlines.
We have not gone to trial yet, but for the past 2 years I wouldn't choose anyone else to stand behind me and my child. If you want injury lawyers and team members who actually care, CHOOSE Christopher Trainor.
Dealing with insurance companies and medical billing is always a pain in the but and didn’t want anyone taking advantage of me and my situation. This team is number 1 in my book.
I recently had the pleasure of working with Chris Trainor, Amy DeRouin and their dedicated team regarding two personal claims. I cannot recommend them highly enough! From our very first consultation, it was clear that I was in capable and caring hands. I would trust them with any personal legal matter.
You Focus On Healing. We Handle Everything Else.
The calls, the bills, and the pressure start before you have recovered. From day one, that is our job, not yours.
Use this practical screen to identify the first construction accident facts, records, and legal questions worth reviewing. It does not calculate a deadline. No sign-up, no dollar estimate, and your answers stay on this page. The result is general information, not legal advice.
Question 1 of 5
Construction injuries often involve workers’ compensation and a separate third-party claim. General contractors, subcontractors, property owners, equipment companies, drivers, and product defendants may each need review.
The main point: do not assume workers’ compensation is the only recovery until the site, contracts, equipment, and non-employer defendants are reviewed.
The strongest jobsite cases identify every person or company that controlled the hazard, not just the employer.
We review fall protection, site control, equipment condition, training, and contractor responsibility.
We review vehicle movement, crane or lift operation, spotters, exclusion zones, and subcontractor conduct.
We preserve the product and review design, manufacturing, warnings, maintenance, and rental records.
We review workers comp, PIP, third-party liability, UM/UIM, and commercial insurance at the same time.
Michigan construction claims often involve workers’ compensation exclusivity, third-party claims under MCL 418.827, product liability, premises issues, work-vehicle No-Fault, and exact-date deadline review.
MCL 418.131 often limits claims directly against the employer, but it does not automatically protect every contractor, owner, driver, or manufacturer.
A separate negligence or product claim may exist when someone other than the employer caused or contributed to the jobsite injury. Under MCL 418.827, proceeds can reimburse compensation paid or payable and affect future benefits after recovery expenses.
Medical care, wage loss, restrictions, provider choice, and disputed causation need review while any third-party case is investigated.
Photos, incident reports, contracts, safety plans, maintenance records, equipment, and witness names should be preserved quickly.
If a motor vehicle was involved, No-Fault PIP, serious-impairment, and commercial coverage issues may overlap with workers comp.
The strongest jobsite cases identify every person or company that controlled the hazard, not just the employer.
Meet by phone, video, or at any of our Michigan offices.
Every case at Christopher Trainor & Associates is a team effort. Our attorneys collaborate on strategy, discovery, and litigation so you get the full strength of the firm behind you—not just a single lawyer. We have built our practice on this collaborative model since 1989.
Meet Our Attorneys