The attacker is not the only question
The civil claim asks whether a property owner, business, landlord, or security company had a legal duty that applied to the facts.
Call Before Video, Property Records, Or A Specific Threat Evidence Disappears
Tell us where the assault happened, what was happening immediately before it, what property conditions or security undertakings existed, and what video or police records may exist. These cases need fast records work.
Sometimes, but a crime on the property does not automatically make the business or landlord responsible. Michigan law requires a duty that applies to the specific situation. An immediate threat to an identifiable person, a property defect, or a security undertaking can raise different questions; crime history alone is not enough.
The civil claim asks whether a property owner, business, landlord, or security company had a legal duty that applied to the facts.
For ordinary third-party criminal acts, Michigan common law focuses on a specific, ongoing situation posing imminent harm to an identifiable person—not general crime history alone.
It costs nothing to find out where you stand.
Negligent-security claims depend on property control and the precise duty at issue. A specific, ongoing threat can matter for a merchant or landlord’s third-party-crime duty; locks, lighting, lease obligations, or an actual security undertaking can raise separate questions.
Owner, landlord, tenant, business, event operator, security company, parking operator, or management company.
What staff or property actors knew while the danger was unfolding, who was identifiable, and whether police involvement could reasonably have been expedited.
Locks, lighting, common-area conditions, security agreements, access control, staffing, policies, training, and emergency response.
Physical injury, PTSD, counseling, wage loss, family impact, disability, and wrongful death.
Start with when and where you were hurt, your injuries, and your main concern. You do not need every record before you call.
We ask about the people involved, any letters or offers you received, and information that could affect the next step.
We explain whether we may be able to help, what information is still needed, and what representation would involve.
A consultation does not commit you to hiring us. Representation begins only after conflict review and a written engagement agreement.
The cases. The work.
The difference it made.
$475K
$475K
$957K
Our client suffered brain damage in a case involving negligence by a corporation.
In their own words. Read what clients and families say about working with our team.
It took over ten years to win my injury case against my old landlord they contacted and updated me on everything involving my case and not only did they never give up they (we) won my case.
We have not gone to trial yet, but for the past 2 years I wouldn't choose anyone else to stand behind me and my child. If you want injury lawyers and team members who actually care, CHOOSE Christopher Trainor.
I recently had the pleasure of working with Chris Trainor, Amy DeRouin and their dedicated team regarding two personal claims. I cannot recommend them highly enough! From our very first consultation, it was clear that I was in capable and caring hands. I would trust them with any personal legal matter.
Focus On Your Recovery. Get Help With Your Claim.
Treatment, bills, and insurance questions can arrive at once. We can review your situation and explain how legal help may fit into your recovery.
Use this practical screen to identify the first negligent security facts, records, and legal questions worth reviewing. It does not calculate a deadline. No sign-up and no dollar estimate. Your answers are only included if you submit the free case review below. The result is general information, not legal advice.
Question 1 of 5
Share what happened, how it has affected you, and a phone number or email where we can reach you. You can ask for a review before you have every report or insurance document.
The main point: Michigan third-party-crime claims require a precise duty analysis. Preserve the immediate-threat evidence, property-control records, and any separate property-condition or contractual-duty proof.
The case is not just whether a crime occurred. It is whether a responsible actor had a duty that applied to the immediate danger, property condition, or security undertaking involved.
We review locks, common areas, lease duties, access control, what the landlord knew while a danger unfolded, and preserved records.
We review the immediate situation, employee knowledge, calls for help, any security undertaking, video, and who controlled the area.
We review crowd control, intoxication, security staffing, an ongoing confrontation, policies, and video.
We review wrongful death, probate, the applicable duty, preserved evidence, and family-loss proof.
Michigan negligent-security cases can involve narrow third-party criminal-act duty limits, landlord or business duties, lease common-area obligations, voluntary security undertakings, premises-condition analysis, comparative fault, wrongful death, and incident-record research.
Under MacDonald and Bailey, a merchant or landlord’s ordinary duty for third-party crime is generally triggered by a specific, ongoing situation posing imminent harm to an identifiable person. The usual response duty is to reasonably expedite police involvement.
Broken locks, lease common-area duties, unsafe physical conditions, or a voluntarily assumed security role can raise separate questions. Kandil-Elsayed concerns premises-condition analysis; it does not erase the MacDonald/Bailey limits.
MCL 554.139 may matter for residential lease and common-area issues.
Police calls, tenant complaints, incident logs, security logs, work orders, leases, and video can help identify the actual duty and evidence. General crime data alone does not create the ordinary third-party-crime duty.
Fatal or severe assault cases may require estate authority, counseling proof, future care, and family-loss documentation.
Meet by phone, video, or at any of our Michigan offices.
Every case at Christopher Trainor & Associates is a team effort. Our attorneys collaborate on strategy, discovery, and litigation so you get the full strength of the firm behind you—not just a single lawyer. We have built our practice on this collaborative model since 1989.
Meet Our Attorneys