The attacker is not the only question
The civil claim asks whether a property owner, business, landlord, or security company had a legal duty that applied to the facts.
Call Before Video, Property Records, Or A Specific Threat Evidence Disappears
Tell us where the assault happened, what was happening immediately before it, what property conditions or security undertakings existed, and what video or police records may exist. These cases need fast records work.
These cases require proof of a real duty, not simply proof that a crime occurred on the property. Michigan third-party-crime rules are narrow and fact-specific.
The civil claim asks whether a property owner, business, landlord, or security company had a legal duty that applied to the facts.
For ordinary third-party criminal acts, Michigan common law focuses on a specific, ongoing situation posing imminent harm to an identifiable person—not general crime history alone.
These cases require proof of a real duty, not simply proof that a crime occurred on the property. Michigan third-party-crime rules are narrow and fact-specific.
Negligent-security claims depend on property control and the precise duty at issue. A specific, ongoing threat can matter for a merchant or landlord’s third-party-crime duty; locks, lighting, lease obligations, or an actual security undertaking can raise separate questions.
It costs nothing to find out where you stand.
Negligent-security claims depend on property control and the precise duty at issue. A specific, ongoing threat can matter for a merchant or landlord’s third-party-crime duty; locks, lighting, lease obligations, or an actual security undertaking can raise separate questions.
Owner, landlord, tenant, business, event operator, security company, parking operator, or management company.
What staff or property actors knew while the danger was unfolding, who was identifiable, and whether police involvement could reasonably have been expedited.
Locks, lighting, common-area conditions, security agreements, access control, staffing, policies, training, and emergency response.
Physical injury, PTSD, counseling, wage loss, family impact, disability, and wrongful death.
Owner, landlord, tenant, business, event operator, security company, parking operator, or management company.
What staff or property actors knew while the danger was unfolding, who was identifiable, and whether police involvement could reasonably have been expedited.
Locks, lighting, common-area conditions, security agreements, access control, staffing, policies, training, and emergency response.
Physical injury, PTSD, counseling, wage loss, family impact, disability, and wrongful death.
The shooting result is documented on attorney Krystina Doss’s profile, but it is not identified as a negligent-security matter. The other results are related unsafe-property cases. Past results do not guarantee a future result.
One review excerpt discusses an injury case involving a landlord; the others address serious-injury support and case service. Negligent-security claims still require their own notice, control, and foreseeability proof.
It took over ten years to win my injury case against my old landlord they contacted and updated me on everything involving my case and not only did they never give up they (we) won my case.
We have not gone to trial yet, but for the past 2 years I wouldn't choose anyone else to stand behind me and my child. If you want injury lawyers and team members who actually care, CHOOSE Christopher Trainor.
I recently had the pleasure of working with Chris Trainor, Amy DeRouin and their dedicated team regarding two personal claims. I cannot recommend them highly enough! From our very first consultation, it was clear that I was in capable and caring hands. I would trust them with any personal legal matter.
You Focus On Healing. We Handle Everything Else.
The calls, the bills, and the pressure start before you have recovered. From day one, that is our job, not yours.
Use this practical screen to identify the first negligent security facts, records, and legal questions worth reviewing. It does not calculate a deadline. No sign-up and no dollar estimate. Your answers are only included if you submit the free case review below. The result is general information, not legal advice.
Question 1 of 5
Negligent-security claims depend on property control and the precise duty at issue. A specific, ongoing threat can matter for a merchant or landlord’s third-party-crime duty; locks, lighting, lease obligations, or an actual security undertaking can raise separate questions.
The main point: Michigan third-party-crime claims require a precise duty analysis. Preserve the immediate-threat evidence, property-control records, and any separate property-condition or contractual-duty proof.
The case is not just whether a crime occurred. It is whether a responsible actor had a duty that applied to the immediate danger, property condition, or security undertaking involved.
We review locks, common areas, lease duties, access control, what the landlord knew while a danger unfolded, and preserved records.
We review the immediate situation, employee knowledge, calls for help, any security undertaking, video, and who controlled the area.
We review crowd control, intoxication, security staffing, an ongoing confrontation, policies, and video.
We review wrongful death, probate, the applicable duty, preserved evidence, and family-loss proof.
Michigan negligent-security cases can involve narrow third-party criminal-act duty limits, landlord or business duties, lease common-area obligations, voluntary security undertakings, premises-condition analysis, comparative fault, wrongful death, and incident-record research.
Under MacDonald and Bailey, a merchant or landlord’s ordinary duty for third-party crime is generally triggered by a specific, ongoing situation posing imminent harm to an identifiable person. The usual response duty is to reasonably expedite police involvement.
Broken locks, lease common-area duties, unsafe physical conditions, or a voluntarily assumed security role can raise separate questions. Kandil-Elsayed concerns premises-condition analysis; it does not erase the MacDonald/Bailey limits.
MCL 554.139 may matter for residential lease and common-area issues.
Police calls, tenant complaints, incident logs, security logs, work orders, leases, and video can help identify the actual duty and evidence. General crime data alone does not create the ordinary third-party-crime duty.
Fatal or severe assault cases may require estate authority, counseling proof, future care, and family-loss documentation.
The case is not just whether a crime occurred. It is whether a responsible actor had a duty that applied to the immediate danger, property condition, or security undertaking involved.
Meet by phone, video, or at any of our Michigan offices.
Every case at Christopher Trainor & Associates is a team effort. Our attorneys collaborate on strategy, discovery, and litigation so you get the full strength of the firm behind you—not just a single lawyer. We have built our practice on this collaborative model since 1989.
Meet Our Attorneys