$1.435M
Motorcyclist hit by a drunk driver; brain and spine injuries
The collision caused a traumatic brain injury and fractures in the lumbar spine.
Lansing office · Serving mid-Michigan
Hurt by an impaired driver? Get help with your injuries and insurance questions while the criminal case follows its own course. Start with a free review of what happened in Lansing.
Start with what you know: when and where it happened, how you were affected, and any reports or messages you have. You do not need a complete file before contacting us. We can explain what else may matter, which records to look for, and whether we can help.
Call if an alcohol- or drug-impaired driver caused medical care, missed work, a serious injury, death, or an insurance dispute. Michigan Legal Center can separate the OWI and civil cases, preserve local and private evidence, review No-Fault personal protection insurance (PIP) and UM/UIM coverage, and investigate a licensed seller only when the facts support it. For the statewide civil framework, see our Michigan drunk driving accident page and lawyer-reviewed guide to claims against impaired drivers and licensed alcohol sellers.
Private video, receipts, payment data, staff or patron witnesses, vehicle information, social or ride records, and public recordings may be controlled by different holders and can become unavailable while the criminal case is still pending.
Read the legal detailsIt costs nothing to learn where you stand. Call (517) 546-2279 or start a free case review.
The cases. The work.
The difference it made.
$1.435M
The collision caused a traumatic brain injury and fractures in the lumbar spine.
$5.2M
A teacher suffered brain and spinal injuries when a Detroit city van hit his stopped car. The City offered $25,000 before trial; a Wayne County jury awarded $5.2 million.
$1.25M
A speeding driver struck the vehicle from behind. The wrongful-death recovery included the available underinsured motorist policy limits.
Police, prosecutors, courts, licensed sellers, private properties, witnesses, vehicles, insurers, and medical providers may each hold a different part of the record.
The UD-10, incident and arrest records, 911 and dispatch, body or dash camera, officer observations, chemical-test information, witnesses, scene evidence, vehicle data, tow records, and criminal docket may document different parts of the event. The correct agency and availability must be verified.
If the facts identify a licensed seller, relevant evidence may include legal licensee identity, receipts, tabs, payment records, surveillance, staff and patron witnesses, social or ride records, and observations of the driver’s behavior when alcohol was furnished. No source or unlawful service should be assumed.
PIP priority, liability limits, UM/UIM terms, releases, medical care through University of Michigan Health-Sparrow, McLaren Greater Lansing, and capital-region providers, later treatment, work loss, household needs, function, prognosis, and wrongful-death proof should be developed independently of the criminal prosecution.
Michigan Traffic Crash Facts recorded 86 alcohol-involved traffic crashes in Lansing in 2024, including 40 injury crashes and 65 people injured. The city totals do not include every nearby East Lansing or MSU incident and do not equate to OWI convictions or dram-shop claims.
City of Lansing Police, East Lansing Police, Michigan State University Police, MSP, and county agencies are separate record holders. The municipal address, campus boundary, exact lane, and responding agency should be verified before a city or university request is sent.
Ingham County victim/witness information concerns the criminal process. A claimant’s civil file separately addresses PIP, fault, serious injury, private video or service evidence, insurance, possible licensed-seller liability, and time-sensitive preservation.
The 2024 figure gives useful context for Lansing, but every claim turns on its own evidence. Police findings, witness accounts, testing, the driver’s actions, insurance records, and any evidence involving an alcohol seller must be evaluated for the individual crash.
| Possible holder | Possible material | How to request or preserve it |
|---|---|---|
| Lansing Police or City of Lansing | City crash, incident, dispatch, recording, traffic, or qualifying Public Video System records | City report, transparency, or FOIA route for the identified category |
| MSU Police, East Lansing, MSP, or another agency | Campus, neighboring-city, freeway, agency, or university-held records | The actual agency or university records/FOIA process |
| Venue, business, residence, parking system, or licensed seller | Conditional private video, receipts, access, payment, staff, patron, or service evidence | Prompt fact-specific preservation and lawful civil process |
| Ingham County prosecutor, victim/witness, or court | Criminal case records and victim-process information | The correct court or prosecutor channel for the actual criminal case |
The exact scene helps identify where to look for reports, video, witnesses, and other records.
Lansing offers one unusually useful local warning: its records schedule lists a short baseline for a category called the Public Video System. That short period makes early preservation important. Other police, city, university, and private video may follow different retention rules.
A crash tied to a Lansing address, East Lansing roadway, MSU campus, or state-controlled corridor may produce records in different systems. The report number and responding agency should lead the request rather than a broad “Lansing-area” label.
Lansing’s published schedule lists “Public Video System” records as 14 days from creation unless kept longer for evidence or training. That schedule entry applies to this municipal category; body-camera footage, other police evidence, MSU systems, and private cameras can follow different rules.
A city FOIA, MSU request, police report, LARA license search, and preservation notice serve different purposes. The civil investigation should direct each request to the proper holder and avoid treating public access as evidence preservation.
No-Fault PIP, the civil claim against a responsible driver or owner, UM/UIM, and a possible licensed-seller claim use different proof and timing. None is automatic from an OWI allegation.
PIP can address allowable medical expenses and certain economic losses without deciding who caused the crash. The proper benefit source and timing depend on the injured person, household coverage, vehicle status, and assigned-claims facts.
A separate motor-vehicle claim requires proof of fault, causation, Michigan’s injury threshold where applicable, comparative fault, damages, and insurance. An OWI charge or conviction can be evidence but does not automatically establish every civil element.
A licensed seller may be a defendant only when the evidence and Michigan’s Dram Shop Act support the claim. Service to a minor or visibly intoxicated person, causation, required parties, notice, and filing rules need prompt attorney review; a license, BAC result, or place visited is not enough.
Answer five short questions about the OWI investigation, timing, injuries, possible civil paths, insurance, and evidence. There is no sign-up and no dollar estimate. Your answers are included only if you submit the free case review below. The result is general information, not legal advice.
Question 1 of 5
A criminal result can be evidence, but the civil case still requires claim-specific proof. Licensed-seller liability additionally requires the elements, parties, notice, and timing in Michigan’s Dram Shop Act.
MCL 257.625 governs Michigan impaired-driving offenses. An investigation, arrest, plea, or conviction can be important evidence, but the civil case still requires proof of responsibility, causation, injury, damages, insurance, and any additional defendant.
MCL 436.1801 distinguishes unlawful service to a minor from service to a visibly intoxicated person. A claim based on visible intoxication requires evidence of outward signs at the time of service; a BAC estimate alone does not establish those signs. A claim based on unlawful service to a minor does not require proof of visible intoxication. Causation, eligible parties, defenses, notice, and filing rules still require claim-specific attorney review.
PIP priority and timing, the motor-vehicle injury threshold, comparative fault, liability insurance, UM/UIM policy conditions, and general injury timing should be reviewed on their own tracks. A criminal case does not pause every civil or insurance requirement.
Identify the crash report, investigating agency, prosecutor and court matter, while independently opening the PIP, liability, UM/UIM, medical, wage-loss, and private-evidence tracks.
Use supported police observations, testing, witnesses, transactions, communications, ride or location information, and any lawful service evidence to determine what can actually be proved without guessing where alcohol came from.
Direct public-record requests, private preservation steps, insurance notices, medical authorizations, and civil discovery to the entities that control each item. FOIA, a police report request, a preservation demand, and a lawsuit are different tools.
Coordinate PIP, driver and owner liability, serious-injury evidence, policy limits, UM/UIM, any legally supported seller claim, liens, medical needs, work loss, family impact, and claim-specific deadlines before resolution.
In their own words. Read what clients and families say about working with our team.
I had a rear end collision with a driver in a Ford F-150 pick up truck and I had multiple surgeries and quite a few medical bills that Ryan Ford worked with multiple providers to ensure the medical bills were paid for.
I loved everything about my experience!!! From start to finish I was always in communication with staff & any concerns or questions I had were handled adequately! Thank you so much for everything. Car accidents are scary but you all made this process so easy & fought hard for me to get paid
Christopher Trainor & Associates represented my mother in an extremely tragic car accident. The insurance company was resistant on paying out her law suit, and the team won our case! Thank you so much for your representation!!
Send the basics. We will check the facts, coverage, deadlines, evidence, and whether hiring us makes sense. No obligation.
Serving Lansing, East Lansing, Okemos, Mason, DeWitt, Charlotte, Williamston, Grand Ledge, and Haslett.
Call before visiting so the team can confirm the right meeting location and time.
Every case at Christopher Trainor & Associates is a team effort. Our attorneys collaborate on strategy, discovery, and litigation so you get the full strength of the firm behind you—not just a single lawyer. We have built our practice on this collaborative model since 1989.
Meet Our Attorneys