$1.435M
Motorcyclist hit by a drunk driver; brain and spine injuries
The collision caused a traumatic brain injury and fractures in the lumbar spine.
White Lake office · Serving northern Oakland County
Hurt by an impaired driver? Get help with your injuries and insurance questions while the criminal case follows its own course. Start with a free review of what happened in White Lake.
Start with what you know: when and where it happened, how you were affected, and any reports or messages you have. You do not need a complete file before contacting us. We can explain what else may matter, which records to look for, and whether we can help.
Call if an alcohol- or drug-impaired driver caused medical care, missed work, a serious injury, death, or an insurance dispute. Michigan Legal Center can separate the OWI and civil cases, preserve local and private evidence, review No-Fault personal protection insurance (PIP) and UM/UIM coverage, and investigate a licensed seller only when the facts support it. For the statewide civil framework, see our Michigan drunk driving accident page and lawyer-reviewed guide to claims against impaired drivers and licensed alcohol sellers.
Private video, receipts, payment data, staff or patron witnesses, vehicle information, social or ride records, and public recordings may be controlled by different holders and can become unavailable while the criminal case is still pending.
Read the legal detailsIt costs nothing to learn where you stand. Call (248) 886-8650 or start a free case review.
The cases. The work.
The difference it made.
$1.435M
The collision caused a traumatic brain injury and fractures in the lumbar spine.
$5.2M
A teacher suffered brain and spinal injuries when a Detroit city van hit his stopped car. The City offered $25,000 before trial; a Wayne County jury awarded $5.2 million.
$1.25M
A speeding driver struck the vehicle from behind. The wrongful-death recovery included the available underinsured motorist policy limits.
Police, prosecutors, courts, licensed sellers, private properties, witnesses, vehicles, insurers, and medical providers may each hold a different part of the record.
The UD-10, incident and arrest records, 911 and dispatch, body or dash camera, officer observations, chemical-test information, witnesses, scene evidence, vehicle data, tow records, and criminal docket may document different parts of the event. The correct agency and availability must be verified.
If the facts identify a licensed seller, relevant evidence may include legal licensee identity, receipts, tabs, payment records, surveillance, staff and patron witnesses, social or ride records, and observations of the driver’s behavior when alcohol was furnished. No source or unlawful service should be assumed.
PIP priority, liability limits, UM/UIM terms, releases, medical care through Huron Valley Sinai Hospital in Commerce Township, McLaren Oakland in Pontiac, and other Oakland County providers, later treatment, work loss, household needs, function, prognosis, and wrongful-death proof should be developed independently of the criminal prosecution.
Michigan Traffic Crash Facts recorded 27 alcohol-involved traffic crashes in White Lake Township in 2024, including 13 injury crashes and 19 people injured. These are crash-level alcohol-involvement figures, not a count of OWI convictions, bar-service claims, or drivers proven civilly at fault.
A White Lake mailing address does not identify the record holder by itself. White Lake Township Police, the Oakland County Sheriff, Michigan State Police, or another agency may hold different parts of the file depending on the exact road, lane, boundary, and response.
Oakland County victim services can help an eligible crime victim understand the criminal process. The prosecutor represents the public, however, and that process does not replace the injured person’s PIP, insurance, driver-liability, or possible dram-shop investigation.
The 2024 figure gives useful context for White Lake Township, but every claim turns on its own evidence. Police findings, witness accounts, testing, the driver’s actions, insurance records, and any evidence involving an alcohol seller must be evaluated for the individual crash.
| Possible holder | Possible material | How to request or preserve it |
|---|---|---|
| White Lake Township Police Records Unit | Crash report, incident or arrest records, and other township-held police material | Township report or FOIA process, matched to the incident number and requested record |
| MSP or another responding public agency | UD-10, agency recordings, dispatch, laboratory, road, or tow-related records | The actual responding agency’s report, records, or FOIA route |
| Possible licensed seller, event, or nearby property | Conditional receipts, point-of-sale data, surveillance, staff or patron witnesses, and license identity | Fact-specific preservation and lawful civil process; license identity may be checked through LARA |
| Oakland County prosecutor, court, or victim-service system | Public criminal docket information, hearing records, and crime-victim process information | The correct prosecutor, court, or victim-service channel for the criminal matter |
The exact scene helps identify where to look for reports, video, witnesses, and other records.
The useful local question is not simply whether police suspected OWI. It is which agency investigated, what the report omits, where the driver may have obtained alcohol, whether any licensed seller can be identified, and which video, receipt, witness, vehicle, or medical records still exist.
The incident number, responding agency, precise lane, and crash-report route should be confirmed before requesting a broad police file. A UD-10 can route the investigation, but separate requests may be needed for dispatch, 911, recordings, arrest material, or another agency’s records.
If the facts point to a commercial corridor or neighborhood, a business, parking area, residence, doorbell camera, payment processor, or witness may have information outside the township file. Identifying the exact scene and timeline helps focus preservation efforts before privately held material is lost.
A state license search may help identify the legal entity associated with a seller or special event. It does not show that the seller served the driver, observed visible intoxication, caused the crash, or violated Michigan’s Dram Shop Act.
No-Fault PIP, the civil claim against a responsible driver or owner, UM/UIM, and a possible licensed-seller claim use different proof and timing. None is automatic from an OWI allegation.
PIP can address allowable medical expenses and certain economic losses without deciding who caused the crash. The proper benefit source and timing depend on the injured person, household coverage, vehicle status, and assigned-claims facts.
A separate motor-vehicle claim requires proof of fault, causation, Michigan’s injury threshold where applicable, comparative fault, damages, and insurance. An OWI charge or conviction can be evidence but does not automatically establish every civil element.
A licensed seller may be a defendant only when the evidence and Michigan’s Dram Shop Act support the claim. Service to a minor or visibly intoxicated person, causation, required parties, notice, and filing rules need prompt attorney review; a license, BAC result, or place visited is not enough.
Answer five short questions about the OWI investigation, timing, injuries, possible civil paths, insurance, and evidence. There is no sign-up and no dollar estimate. Your answers are included only if you submit the free case review below. The result is general information, not legal advice.
Question 1 of 5
A criminal result can be evidence, but the civil case still requires claim-specific proof. Licensed-seller liability additionally requires the elements, parties, notice, and timing in Michigan’s Dram Shop Act.
MCL 257.625 governs Michigan impaired-driving offenses. An investigation, arrest, plea, or conviction can be important evidence, but the civil case still requires proof of responsibility, causation, injury, damages, insurance, and any additional defendant.
MCL 436.1801 distinguishes unlawful service to a minor from service to a visibly intoxicated person. A claim based on visible intoxication requires evidence of outward signs at the time of service; a BAC estimate alone does not establish those signs. A claim based on unlawful service to a minor does not require proof of visible intoxication. Causation, eligible parties, defenses, notice, and filing rules still require claim-specific attorney review.
PIP priority and timing, the motor-vehicle injury threshold, comparative fault, liability insurance, UM/UIM policy conditions, and general injury timing should be reviewed on their own tracks. A criminal case does not pause every civil or insurance requirement.
Identify the crash report, investigating agency, prosecutor and court matter, while independently opening the PIP, liability, UM/UIM, medical, wage-loss, and private-evidence tracks.
Use supported police observations, testing, witnesses, transactions, communications, ride or location information, and any lawful service evidence to determine what can actually be proved without guessing where alcohol came from.
Direct public-record requests, private preservation steps, insurance notices, medical authorizations, and civil discovery to the entities that control each item. FOIA, a police report request, a preservation demand, and a lawsuit are different tools.
Coordinate PIP, driver and owner liability, serious-injury evidence, policy limits, UM/UIM, any legally supported seller claim, liens, medical needs, work loss, family impact, and claim-specific deadlines before resolution.
In their own words. Read what clients and families say about working with our team.
I had a rear end collision with a driver in a Ford F-150 pick up truck and I had multiple surgeries and quite a few medical bills that Ryan Ford worked with multiple providers to ensure the medical bills were paid for.
I loved everything about my experience!!! From start to finish I was always in communication with staff & any concerns or questions I had were handled adequately! Thank you so much for everything. Car accidents are scary but you all made this process so easy & fought hard for me to get paid
Christopher Trainor & Associates represented my mother in an extremely tragic car accident. The insurance company was resistant on paying out her law suit, and the team won our case! Thank you so much for your representation!!
Send the basics. We will check the facts, coverage, deadlines, evidence, and whether hiring us makes sense. No obligation.
Serving White Lake, Commerce Township, Waterford Township, Pontiac, Clarkston, Wixom, Highland Township, and Milford.
Call before visiting so the team can confirm the right meeting location and time.
Every case at Christopher Trainor & Associates is a team effort. Our attorneys collaborate on strategy, discovery, and litigation so you get the full strength of the firm behind you—not just a single lawyer. We have built our practice on this collaborative model since 1989.
Meet Our Attorneys