$6.2M
Police excessive force; $4.91M verdict plus fees, costs and interest
An officer punched our client unconscious during a traffic stop. The final judgment includes the jury’s award, attorney fees, costs and interest.
Kalamazoo office · Serving southwest Michigan
Hurt by police force? Get help preserving video, documenting injuries, and understanding whether you may have a civil claim. Start with a free review of what happened in Kalamazoo.
Start with what you know: when and where it happened, how you were affected, and any reports or messages you have. You do not need a complete file before contacting us. We can explain what else may matter, which records to look for, and whether we can help.
Call about a Kalamazoo matter when police or another government actor used force and the complete encounter, threat, resistance, restraint, custody stage, injury, video, or official account is disputed. The first Kalamazoo review identifies the person’s status and stage of the encounter, each force act and actor, objective circumstances, recordings, device and medical proof, criminal-case overlap, individual defenses, entity evidence, causation, and damages. The Michigan police brutality guide explains the statewide law and how it may apply to your situation.
Bodycam, dashcam, jail or facility video, dispatch, CAD, force reports, Taser and other device logs, photographs, medical records, private cameras, phone files, and witness memory can follow different retention paths.
Read the legal detailsIt costs nothing to learn where you stand. Call (269) 447-2200 or start a free case review.
The cases. The work.
The difference it made.
$6.2M
An officer punched our client unconscious during a traffic stop. The final judgment includes the jury’s award, attorney fees, costs and interest.
Appeal win
The Sixth Circuit preserved three federal claims involving a mental-health seizure and use of force. The case still required further proceedings.
Case result
Our client warned officers about her wrist surgery before they handcuffed her. Medical records and witness statements supported her excessive-force case.
Appeal win
The appellate ruling allowed Ehsan Ouza’s claims to move forward, including a claim that the city failed to train or supervise its officers.
Police and road agencies, platforms, drivers, passengers, vehicle owners, private camera holders, transit or parking systems, insurers, and medical providers may each hold a different part of the record.
Kalamazoo Department of Public Safety, Kalamazoo County Sheriff, Portage Public Safety, Western Michigan University police, MSP, dispatch, jail staff, medical contractors, and other actors can control different records. Preserve the complete reports, recordings, CAD and radio traffic, warrants, booking, transport, complaint, policy and metadata held by the actors actually involved.
Bronson Methodist, Beacon Kalamazoo, EMS, custody health staff, behavioral-health professionals, rehabilitation providers, and Kalamazoo County death investigators may produce separate timelines. Match EMS, facility, custody, forensic, treatment, photographs, symptoms, restrictions, work and future-care proof to the event timeline without treating one note or diagnosis as conclusive.
Downtown one-way streets, WMU properties, Metro vehicles, I-94 and US-131 businesses, entertainment sites, apartments, hospitals, doorbells, phones, employers and witnesses may preserve independent proof. Document possible holders and preservation dates early; not every camera recorded, retained, or lawfully discloses the event.
City public-document requests and KDPS channels cover particular city files, while Kalamazoo County, WMU, Portage, a prosecutor, court, jail, hospital, business, residence, vehicle or phone needs holder-specific preservation. Records requests, preservation notices, discovery, authorizations, subpoenas, and litigation holds are different tools. None guarantees a record exists or can be produced.
| Evidence | Possible holder | Why it may matter |
|---|---|---|
| Kalamazoo agency recordings and event files | Kalamazoo Department of Public Safety, Kalamazoo County Sheriff, Portage Public Safety, Western Michigan University police, MSP, dispatch, jail staff, medical contractors, and other actors can control different records. | Body, dash, facility or vehicle video, 911, CAD, radio, reports, force or arrest records, warrants, property, transport, complaint and policy material should be placed on one verified timeline. |
| Court, prosecutor, booking and detention sequence | The 8th District Court, Kalamazoo County 9th Circuit and Probate Courts, and Western District of Michigan serve different proceedings; the Rose Street office does not fix venue. | Complaints, affidavits, warrants, charging papers, dockets, transcripts, orders, booking, transfer and release records can answer different probable-cause, process, custody, damages and claim-overlap questions. |
| Medical, EMS, forensic and functional proof | Bronson Methodist, Beacon Kalamazoo, EMS, custody health staff, behavioral-health professionals, rehabilitation providers, and Kalamazoo County death investigators may produce separate timelines. | Clinical records can document timing, symptoms, diagnosis, causation, restraint or custody effects and future care, but they do not by themselves decide whether conduct was unconstitutional. |
| Independent video, devices, witnesses and property | Downtown one-way streets, WMU properties, Metro vehicles, I-94 and US-131 businesses, entertainment sites, apartments, hospitals, doorbells, phones, employers and witnesses may preserve independent proof. | Independent sources can test camera angles, movement, warnings, threat, resistance, identification, timing and the official account; the existence and availability of any recording must be verified. |
| Policy, training, supervision, contractor and entity proof | The verified municipality, county, state entity, public institution, contractor, insurer, vendor, decisionmaker, auditor, records custodian, or other organization connected to the supported theory. | Entity and supervisory theories use evidence beyond employment or one incident and require the qualifying policy, custom, decision, omission, personal involvement and causation required by current law. |
The exact scene helps identify where to look for reports, video, witnesses, and other records.
A Kalamazoo force review should pair KDPS or another agency’s recordings with dispatch, fire/EMS chronology, force documentation, private downtown or campus video, injury evidence and custody status. City public-document requests and KDPS channels cover particular city files, while Kalamazoo County, WMU, Portage, a prosecutor, court, jail, hospital, business, residence, vehicle or phone needs holder-specific preservation.
Records requests, preservation notices, discovery, authorizations, subpoenas, and litigation holds are different tools. None guarantees a record exists or can be produced.
Kalamazoo Department of Public Safety, Kalamazoo County Sheriff, Portage Public Safety, Western Michigan University police, MSP, dispatch, jail staff, medical contractors, and other actors can control different records. The force standard and intervention question depend on custody status, event phase, and each actor’s opportunity.
The 8th District Court, Kalamazoo County 9th Circuit and Probate Courts, and Western District of Michigan serve different proceedings; the Rose Street office does not fix venue. Bronson Methodist, Beacon Kalamazoo, EMS, custody health staff, behavioral-health professionals, rehabilitation providers, and Kalamazoo County death investigators may produce separate timelines. Each docket, medical record, report, administrative outcome, and forensic finding has a limited purpose.
Downtown one-way streets, WMU properties, Metro vehicles, I-94 and US-131 businesses, entertainment sites, apartments, hospitals, doorbells, phones, employers and witnesses may preserve independent proof. Record the exact location, time, custodian, and device before evidence is overwritten or altered.
Force, arrest, broad constitutional harm, and a fatal event can overlap, but they do not use the same proof or legal framework. Start with the page that matches the decision you need to make.
Read the statewide Police Brutality overview Compare the broader Michigan Police Misconduct path
These are possible legal paths, not automatic claims. The answer depends on the event, defendant, policy, injuries, forum, and current law.
Review the complete force sequence, severity, threat, resistance or flight, proportionality, each actor’s conduct, body/dash/private video, device logs, scene proof, medical causation and policy evidence. Personal involvement, knowledge, opportunity, causation, immunity and legally recoverable harm must be matched to each person rather than the agency name alone.
Potential parties include officers, actors with a realistic opportunity to intervene, supervisors, municipalities or counties, custody entities, contractors and medical providers only as the evidence and legal elements support. Employment, supervision, contracting, a policy issue or an objectionable outcome does not by itself establish liability.
Kalamazoo probate, forensic, hospital and correctional evidence remains distinct from the negligence, constitutional, malpractice, product or other theory underlying a death. State-law claims, criminal proceedings, insurance or benefits, estate authority, immunity, notice, forum and timing require separate analysis and may involve different parties.
Answer five short questions to organize the timing, harm, possible claims, evidence risk, and current status. There is no sign-up and no dollar estimate. Your answers are included only if you submit the free case review below. The result is general information, not legal advice.
Question 1 of 5
The rules below explain how a claim may work. The deadlines, available insurance and responsibility for an injury still depend on the facts of your case.
Graham directs courts to evaluate many seizure-related force claims from the perspective of a reasonable officer at the time, including severity, threat, resistance or flight. Barnes rejects a moment-of-threat-only restriction and confirms that the totality of the circumstances matters.
Garner addresses deadly force during seizure, Kingsley addresses pretrial-detainee force, and Hudson addresses force against convicted prisoners. The person’s status and exact phase cannot be assumed.
Section 1983 is the civil vehicle for a proven federal-right violation. A municipality is not vicariously liable for an employee; its own qualifying policy, custom, decision or omission must cause the violation.
Identify the person’s status and exact phase of the encounter because force during a stop or arrest, pretrial detention, and imprisonment can use different constitutional standards. Record every location, actor, agency, command, movement, restraint, search, arrest, custody transfer, court event, medical contact and later communication.
City public-document requests and KDPS channels cover particular city files, while Kalamazoo County, WMU, Portage, a prosecutor, court, jail, hospital, business, residence, vehicle or phone needs holder-specific preservation. Records requests, preservation notices, discovery, authorizations, subpoenas, and litigation holds are different tools. None guarantees a record exists or can be produced. Downtown one-way streets, WMU properties, Metro vehicles, I-94 and US-131 businesses, entertainment sites, apartments, hospitals, doorbells, phones, employers and witnesses may preserve independent proof.
Identify potential parties: officers, actors with a realistic opportunity to intervene, supervisors, municipalities or counties, custody entities, contractors and medical providers only as the evidence and legal elements support. Coordinate criminal counsel, court files, state-law issues, estate or benefit questions without assuming one proceeding controls the others.
Bronson Methodist, Beacon Kalamazoo, EMS, custody health staff, behavioral-health professionals, rehabilitation providers, and Kalamazoo County death investigators may produce separate timelines. Connect the supported conduct to physical, liberty, economic, emotional, family or estate harm under the rules that govern the actual claim.
In their own words. Read what clients and families say about working with our team.
We have not gone to trial yet, but for the past 2 years I wouldn't choose anyone else to stand behind me and my child. If you want injury lawyers and team members who actually care, CHOOSE Christopher Trainor.
Dealing with insurance companies and medical billing is always a pain in the but and didn’t want anyone taking advantage of me and my situation. This team is number 1 in my book.
I recently had the pleasure of working with Chris Trainor, Amy DeRouin and their dedicated team regarding two personal claims. I cannot recommend them highly enough! From our very first consultation, it was clear that I was in capable and caring hands. I would trust them with any personal legal matter.
Send the basics. We will check the facts, coverage, deadlines, evidence, and whether hiring us makes sense. No obligation.
Serving Kalamazoo, Portage, Battle Creek, Vicksburg, Paw Paw, Mattawan, Three Rivers, Sturgis, and Oshtemo.
Call before visiting so the team can confirm the right meeting location and time.
Every case at Christopher Trainor & Associates is a team effort. Our attorneys collaborate on strategy, discovery, and litigation so you get the full strength of the firm behind you—not just a single lawyer. We have built our practice on this collaborative model since 1989.
Meet Our Attorneys