$6.2M
Police excessive force; $4.91M verdict plus fees, costs and interest
An officer punched our client unconscious during a traffic stop. The final judgment includes the jury’s award, attorney fees, costs and interest.
White Lake office · Serving northern Oakland County
Hurt by police force? Get help preserving video, documenting injuries, and understanding whether you may have a civil claim. Start with a free review of what happened in White Lake.
Start with what you know: when and where it happened, how you were affected, and any reports or messages you have. You do not need a complete file before contacting us. We can explain what else may matter, which records to look for, and whether we can help.
Call about a White Lake matter when police or another government actor used force and the complete encounter, threat, resistance, restraint, custody stage, injury, video, or official account is disputed. The first White Lake review identifies the person’s status and stage of the encounter, each force act and actor, objective circumstances, recordings, device and medical proof, criminal-case overlap, individual defenses, entity evidence, causation, and damages. The Michigan police brutality guide explains the statewide law and how it may apply to your situation.
Bodycam, dashcam, jail or facility video, dispatch, CAD, force reports, Taser and other device logs, photographs, medical records, private cameras, phone files, and witness memory can follow different retention paths.
Read the legal detailsIt costs nothing to learn where you stand. Call (248) 886-8650 or start a free case review.
The cases. The work.
The difference it made.
$6.2M
An officer punched our client unconscious during a traffic stop. The final judgment includes the jury’s award, attorney fees, costs and interest.
Appeal win
The Sixth Circuit preserved three federal claims involving a mental-health seizure and use of force. The case still required further proceedings.
Case result
Our client warned officers about her wrist surgery before they handcuffed her. Medical records and witness statements supported her excessive-force case.
Appeal win
The appellate ruling allowed Ehsan Ouza’s claims to move forward, including a claim that the city failed to train or supervise its officers.
Police and road agencies, platforms, drivers, passengers, vehicle owners, private camera holders, transit or parking systems, insurers, and medical providers may each hold a different part of the record.
White Lake Township Police, the Oakland County Sheriff, Michigan State Police, dispatch, a jail or medical contractor, and other public actors are separate possible record holders; the event identifies which entities were actually involved. Preserve the complete reports, recordings, CAD and radio traffic, warrants, booking, transport, complaint, policy and metadata held by the actors actually involved.
Huron Valley-Sinai, McLaren Oakland, EMS, custody providers, rehabilitation professionals, and the Oakland County Medical Examiner can document different parts of injury, detention, cause of death, or damages. Match EMS, facility, custody, forensic, treatment, photographs, symptoms, restrictions, work and future-care proof to the event timeline without treating one note or diagnosis as conclusive.
M-59 businesses, Highland Road properties, residences, doorbells, lake-area sites, vehicles, phones, tow operators, employers, witnesses, and social-media accounts are potential—not guaranteed—sources. Document possible holders and preservation dates early; not every camera recorded, retained, or lawfully discloses the event.
White Lake police and township FOIA routes can lead to incident, dispatch, body-camera, dash-camera, complaint, policy, or booking material, while Oakland County and CLEMIS-connected systems may require their own requests and preservation work. Records requests, preservation notices, discovery, authorizations, subpoenas, and litigation holds are different tools. None guarantees a record exists or can be produced.
| Evidence | Possible holder | Why it may matter |
|---|---|---|
| White Lake agency recordings and event files | White Lake Township Police, the Oakland County Sheriff, Michigan State Police, dispatch, a jail or medical contractor, and other public actors are separate possible record holders; the event identifies which entities were actually involved. | Body, dash, facility or vehicle video, 911, CAD, radio, reports, force or arrest records, warrants, property, transport, complaint and policy material should be placed on one verified timeline. |
| Court, prosecutor, booking and detention sequence | The 51st District Court, Oakland County Circuit Court, Oakland County Probate Court, and the Eastern District of Michigan serve different functions; the right forum follows the claims, defendants, event and jurisdiction rather than the firm office. | Complaints, affidavits, warrants, charging papers, dockets, transcripts, orders, booking, transfer and release records can answer different probable-cause, process, custody, damages and claim-overlap questions. |
| Medical, EMS, forensic and functional proof | Huron Valley-Sinai, McLaren Oakland, EMS, custody providers, rehabilitation professionals, and the Oakland County Medical Examiner can document different parts of injury, detention, cause of death, or damages. | Clinical records can document timing, symptoms, diagnosis, causation, restraint or custody effects and future care, but they do not by themselves decide whether conduct was unconstitutional. |
| Independent video, devices, witnesses and property | M-59 businesses, Highland Road properties, residences, doorbells, lake-area sites, vehicles, phones, tow operators, employers, witnesses, and social-media accounts are potential—not guaranteed—sources. | Independent sources can test camera angles, movement, warnings, threat, resistance, identification, timing and the official account; the existence and availability of any recording must be verified. |
| Policy, training, supervision, contractor and entity proof | The verified municipality, county, state entity, public institution, contractor, insurer, vendor, decisionmaker, auditor, records custodian, or other organization connected to the supported theory. | Entity and supervisory theories use evidence beyond employment or one incident and require the qualifying policy, custom, decision, omission, personal involvement and causation required by current law. |
The exact scene helps identify where to look for reports, video, witnesses, and other records.
A White Lake force file should synchronize the complete encounter with medical timing, use-of-force reporting, device deployment and private M-59 corridor video rather than treating the first report as the whole event. White Lake police and township FOIA routes can lead to incident, dispatch, body-camera, dash-camera, complaint, policy, or booking material, while Oakland County and CLEMIS-connected systems may require their own requests and preservation work.
Records requests, preservation notices, discovery, authorizations, subpoenas, and litigation holds are different tools. None guarantees a record exists or can be produced.
White Lake Township Police, the Oakland County Sheriff, Michigan State Police, dispatch, a jail or medical contractor, and other public actors are separate possible record holders; the event identifies which entities were actually involved. The force standard and intervention question depend on custody status, event phase, and each actor’s opportunity.
The 51st District Court, Oakland County Circuit Court, Oakland County Probate Court, and the Eastern District of Michigan serve different functions; the right forum follows the claims, defendants, event and jurisdiction rather than the firm office. Huron Valley-Sinai, McLaren Oakland, EMS, custody providers, rehabilitation professionals, and the Oakland County Medical Examiner can document different parts of injury, detention, cause of death, or damages. Each docket, medical record, report, administrative outcome, and forensic finding has a limited purpose.
M-59 businesses, Highland Road properties, residences, doorbells, lake-area sites, vehicles, phones, tow operators, employers, witnesses, and social-media accounts are potential—not guaranteed—sources. Record the exact location, time, custodian, and device before evidence is overwritten or altered.
Force, arrest, broad constitutional harm, and a fatal event can overlap, but they do not use the same proof or legal framework. Start with the page that matches the decision you need to make.
Read the statewide Police Brutality overview Compare the broader Michigan Police Misconduct path
These are possible legal paths, not automatic claims. The answer depends on the event, defendant, policy, injuries, forum, and current law.
Review the complete force sequence, severity, threat, resistance or flight, proportionality, each actor’s conduct, body/dash/private video, device logs, scene proof, medical causation and policy evidence. Personal involvement, knowledge, opportunity, causation, immunity and legally recoverable harm must be matched to each person rather than the agency name alone.
Potential parties include officers, actors with a realistic opportunity to intervene, supervisors, municipalities or counties, custody entities, contractors and medical providers only as the evidence and legal elements support. Employment, supervision, contracting, a policy issue or an objectionable outcome does not by itself establish liability.
If the event became fatal or continued in custody, jail, contractor, medical-examiner, probate and underlying-liability records remain distinct tracks. State-law claims, criminal proceedings, insurance or benefits, estate authority, immunity, notice, forum and timing require separate analysis and may involve different parties.
Answer five short questions to organize the timing, harm, possible claims, evidence risk, and current status. There is no sign-up and no dollar estimate. Your answers are included only if you submit the free case review below. The result is general information, not legal advice.
Question 1 of 5
The rules below explain how a claim may work. The deadlines, available insurance and responsibility for an injury still depend on the facts of your case.
Graham directs courts to evaluate many seizure-related force claims from the perspective of a reasonable officer at the time, including severity, threat, resistance or flight. Barnes rejects a moment-of-threat-only restriction and confirms that the totality of the circumstances matters.
Garner addresses deadly force during seizure, Kingsley addresses pretrial-detainee force, and Hudson addresses force against convicted prisoners. The person’s status and exact phase cannot be assumed.
Section 1983 is the civil vehicle for a proven federal-right violation. A municipality is not vicariously liable for an employee; its own qualifying policy, custom, decision or omission must cause the violation.
Identify the person’s status and exact phase of the encounter because force during a stop or arrest, pretrial detention, and imprisonment can use different constitutional standards. Record every location, actor, agency, command, movement, restraint, search, arrest, custody transfer, court event, medical contact and later communication.
White Lake police and township FOIA routes can lead to incident, dispatch, body-camera, dash-camera, complaint, policy, or booking material, while Oakland County and CLEMIS-connected systems may require their own requests and preservation work. Records requests, preservation notices, discovery, authorizations, subpoenas, and litigation holds are different tools. None guarantees a record exists or can be produced. M-59 businesses, Highland Road properties, residences, doorbells, lake-area sites, vehicles, phones, tow operators, employers, witnesses, and social-media accounts are potential—not guaranteed—sources.
Identify potential parties: officers, actors with a realistic opportunity to intervene, supervisors, municipalities or counties, custody entities, contractors and medical providers only as the evidence and legal elements support. Coordinate criminal counsel, court files, state-law issues, estate or benefit questions without assuming one proceeding controls the others.
Huron Valley-Sinai, McLaren Oakland, EMS, custody providers, rehabilitation professionals, and the Oakland County Medical Examiner can document different parts of injury, detention, cause of death, or damages. Connect the supported conduct to physical, liberty, economic, emotional, family or estate harm under the rules that govern the actual claim.
In their own words. Read what clients and families say about working with our team.
We have not gone to trial yet, but for the past 2 years I wouldn't choose anyone else to stand behind me and my child. If you want injury lawyers and team members who actually care, CHOOSE Christopher Trainor.
Dealing with insurance companies and medical billing is always a pain in the but and didn’t want anyone taking advantage of me and my situation. This team is number 1 in my book.
I recently had the pleasure of working with Chris Trainor, Amy DeRouin and their dedicated team regarding two personal claims. I cannot recommend them highly enough! From our very first consultation, it was clear that I was in capable and caring hands. I would trust them with any personal legal matter.
Send the basics. We will check the facts, coverage, deadlines, evidence, and whether hiring us makes sense. No obligation.
Serving White Lake, Commerce Township, Waterford Township, Pontiac, Clarkston, Wixom, Highland Township, and Milford.
Call before visiting so the team can confirm the right meeting location and time.
Every case at Christopher Trainor & Associates is a team effort. Our attorneys collaborate on strategy, discovery, and litigation so you get the full strength of the firm behind you—not just a single lawyer. We have built our practice on this collaborative model since 1989.
Meet Our Attorneys