Personal Injury
Governmental Immunity
12 statutes with plain-language summaries, case relevance, source links, and related Michigan practice areas.
Statutory text checked against the Michigan Compiled Laws, complete through PA 16 of 2026, on June 12, 2026.
Governmental Immunity
12 statutes"No claim may be maintained against the state unless the claimant, within 1 year after the claim has accrued, files in the office of the clerk of the court of claims either a written claim or a written notice of intention to file a claim." For property-damage or personal-injury claims against the state, the statute requires filing the claim or notice within 6 months after the event giving rise to the claim.Read Full Statute
To sue the State of Michigan, MCL 600.6431 generally requires a verified claim or notice of intention to file a claim within 1 year after the claim accrues. Claims for property damage or personal injury against the state generally have a shorter 6-month deadline.
Missing the correct Court of Claims timing rule can permanently bar a claim against the State of Michigan even if another limitations period has not expired. The applicable deadline depends on the type of state claim.
We identify state government defendants immediately upon intake and calendar the specific Court of Claims deadline as a first-priority action before addressing any other aspect of the claim.
"Each governmental agency having jurisdiction over a highway shall maintain the highway in reasonable repair so that it is reasonably safe and convenient for public travel." The duty and liability are limited to the improved portion of the highway designed for vehicular travel and do not include sidewalks, trailways, crosswalks, or other installations outside that improved portion unless otherwise provided.Read Full Statute
The highway exception requires a governmental agency with jurisdiction over a highway to keep the highway in reasonable repair so it is reasonably safe and convenient for public travel. The statute limits the duty and liability to the improved portion of the highway designed for vehicular travel unless another provision applies.
Public-road defect claims are narrow and deadline-sensitive. Sidewalks, trailways, crosswalks, design theories, and installations outside the improved vehicular portion require separate legal review instead of assuming the highway exception applies.
We identify the responsible road authority, preserve location evidence, and evaluate whether the defect falls within the limited statutory highway exception before filing.
"A municipal corporation in which a sidewalk is installed adjacent to a municipal, county, or state highway shall maintain the sidewalk in reasonable repair." Liability requires proof of actual or constructive knowledge at least 30 days before the injury, and the statute includes the 2-inch presumption and preserved common-law defenses.Read Full Statute
A municipal corporation must maintain covered sidewalks in reasonable repair, but liability requires proof that at least 30 days before the injury the municipality knew or should have known of the defect. The statute presumes reasonable repair unless the plaintiff shows a 2-inch or greater vertical discontinuity or another dangerous sidewalk condition, and it preserves common-law defenses including open and obvious.
Sidewalk injury claims against cities, villages, and townships are not analyzed exactly like highway-lane defect claims. The 30-day knowledge rule, 2-inch presumption, and preserved defenses can decide whether a municipal sidewalk case survives.
We measure the defect, preserve photographs, identify the responsible municipality, and investigate complaints, repairs, inspections, and notice evidence before filing.
"No governmental agency is liable for injuries or damages caused by a defective highway unless the governmental agency knew, or in the exercise of reasonable diligence should have known, of the existence of the defect and had a reasonable time to repair the defect before the injury took place. Knowledge and time to repair are conclusively presumed when the defect was readily apparent for 30 days or longer before the injury."Read Full Statute
For highway-defect claims, a governmental agency is liable only if it knew, or should have known through reasonable diligence, about the defect and had a reasonable time to repair it before the injury. Knowledge and time to repair are conclusively presumed when the defect was readily apparent for 30 days or longer before the injury.
Highway-defect claims often turn on how long the defect existed and whether the responsible government agency had actual or constructive notice. Whether a particular location qualifies under the highway exception still must be analyzed separately.
We gather photographs, maintenance records, prior complaints, inspection logs, and witness evidence to prove how long the defect existed and whether the agency had a reasonable opportunity to fix it.
"As a condition to any recovery for injuries sustained by reason of a defective highway, the injured person shall serve notice on the governmental agency of the occurrence of the injury and the defect within 120 days from the time the injury occurred. The notice must specify the exact location and nature of the defect, the injury sustained, and the names of witnesses known at the time by the claimant."Read Full Statute
A person injured by a defective highway must generally serve written notice on the responsible governmental agency within 120 days of the injury. The notice must identify the location and nature of the defect, the injury sustained, and known witnesses.
Highway-defect claims can be lost before a lawsuit is filed if the required notice is not served correctly and on time. Claims against the State of Michigan also require the specific filing method required by the statute.
We identify the responsible road authority, prepare the required notice, preserve location evidence, and file quickly enough to protect highway-defect claims.
"Governmental agencies shall be liable for bodily injury and property damage resulting from the negligent operation by any officer, agent, or employee of the governmental agency, of a motor vehicle of which the governmental agency is owner."Read Full Statute
Government agencies can be liable for bodily injury and property damage caused by the negligent operation of a government-owned motor vehicle by a government officer, agent, or employee.
If you were hit by a police vehicle, school bus, city truck, county vehicle, snowplow, or other government-owned vehicle, this exception may allow a claim despite governmental immunity.
We pursue motor vehicle exception claims by obtaining crash reports, dashcam or bodycam footage, dispatch records, vehicle ownership records, and maintenance evidence.
"Governmental agencies have the obligation to repair and maintain public buildings under their control when open for use by members of the public." Liability requires actual or constructive knowledge of the defect and failure to remedy it or protect the public within a reasonable time. Knowledge is conclusively presumed when the defect existed so as to be readily apparent for 90 days or longer. Notice must generally be served within 120 days.Read Full Statute
Government agencies can be liable for injuries caused by a dangerous or defective condition in a public building if the agency had actual or constructive knowledge of the defect and failed to repair it or protect the public within a reasonable time. Knowledge is conclusively presumed if the defect was readily apparent for 90 days or longer, and the statute includes a 120-day notice requirement.
Slip and falls, structural failures, and other injuries in schools, courthouses, government offices, and other public buildings may qualify for this exception if the statutory requirements are met.
We document the building defect, identify the responsible agency, investigate prior notice, and serve any required notice quickly enough to preserve the claim.
"Except as otherwise provided in this act, a governmental agency is immune from tort liability if the governmental agency is engaged in the exercise or discharge of a governmental function."Read Full Statute
Michigan's primary governmental immunity statute gives governmental agencies broad immunity from tort liability when they are exercising or discharging a governmental function, except as otherwise provided by the Act.
Governmental immunity is a powerful defense that can bar tort claims against a government entity. Identifying whether a statutory exception or a non-tort legal theory applies is essential from the beginning.
We identify the specific defendant, the function involved, and the strongest available exception or alternative legal theory before making immunity concessions.
"A judge, a legislator, and the elective or highest appointive executive official of all levels of government are immune from tort liability for injuries to persons or damages to property whenever they are acting within the scope of their judicial, legislative, or executive authority."Read Full Statute
Judges, legislators, and elective or highest appointive executive officials of all levels of government are immune from tort liability for injuries or property damage when acting within the scope of their judicial, legislative, or executive authority.
This provision can bar state tort claims against high-level government officials for covered official acts. Claims involving conduct outside the official's authority or claims under a different legal theory require separate review.
In cases involving high-level official conduct, we identify whether the claim is a barred state tort claim or whether another remedy, including a civil-rights or administrative remedy, should be evaluated.
"The immunity of the governmental agency shall not apply to actions to recover for bodily injury or property damage arising out of the performance of a proprietary function as defined in this section." Proprietary function means an activity conducted primarily for pecuniary profit, excluding activity normally supported by taxes or fees.Read Full Statute
A governmental agency is not immune when it is engaged in a proprietary function: an activity conducted primarily to produce a pecuniary profit, excluding activities normally supported by taxes or fees.
Determining whether a government activity is truly proprietary is heavily contested. Revenue alone is not enough; the activity must be primarily profit-driven and not normally tax- or fee-supported.
We analyze the purpose, funding, and revenue structure of government-operated facilities or programs to determine whether the proprietary function exception can overcome immunity.
"Governmental agency" means this state or a political subdivision. "Governmental function" means an activity that is expressly or impliedly mandated or authorized by constitution, statute, local charter or ordinance, or other law.Read Full Statute
MCL 691.1401 defines key Governmental Immunity Act terms, including governmental agency, governmental function, highway, municipal corporation, political subdivision, sidewalk, state, township, and volunteer. MCL 691.1415 is only the Act's original effective-date section.
Whether a defendant qualifies as a 'governmental agency' is the threshold question in every immunity case. Some quasi-governmental or privatized entities are not actually immune under this statute.
We research the legal structure and authority of every defendant before making immunity concessions — some entities that look governmental are not immune.
MCL 691.1416 defines terms for sewage-disposal-system event claims, including "affected property," "appropriate governmental agency," "defect," "sewage disposal system," "sewage disposal system event," and "substantial proximate cause." It is not a negligent-highway-design statute.Read Full Statute
MCL 691.1416 defines terms used in Michigan's sewage-disposal-system event statute, including affected property, appropriate governmental agency, claimant, defect, sewage disposal system, sewage disposal system event, and substantial proximate cause. It is not a highway negligent-design statute.
Sewer-backup and sewage-overflow cases against government agencies follow a separate statutory framework. They should not be confused with highway repair-and-maintenance claims or road-design theories.
We identify whether the event fits the statutory definitions, which agency owned or operated the relevant system, and whether the claim belongs under the sewage-disposal-system event provisions.