Michigan Wrongful Conviction Lawyers

Michigan Wrongful Conviction Attorneys — State Compensation and Federal Civil Rights Claims

An innocent person who serves ten years in a Michigan prison is entitled to $500,000 under the state's Wrongful Imprisonment Compensation Act. That number sounds substantial until you consider what those ten years actually cost: lost wages across what should have been the peak earning years of a career, destroyed professional reputation, fractured family relationships, deteriorating health from inadequate prison medical care, and the psychological damage of a decade in confinement for something you did not do.

The state compensation provides a floor. A federal civil rights lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pursues accountability and compensation beyond that floor — from the detective who fabricated witness statements, the officer who suppressed the exculpatory evidence that would have ended the prosecution before trial, or the investigator who ran a tunnel-vision investigation that ignored evidence pointing elsewhere. Our civil rights verdicts of $6.2 million, $5.8 million, and $5.5 million in police misconduct cases demonstrate what this firm does when government actors abuse their authority.

Every wrongful conviction case is on contingency. Nothing upfront and no fee unless we win.

Types of Wrongful Conviction Cases We Handle

Wrongful convictions arise from identifiable patterns of government failure and misconduct. Our attorneys have handled cases involving every major source of wrongful imprisonment.

• Brady evidence violations (suppression of exculpatory material)
• Fabricated evidence by police or investigators
• Coerced or false confessions
• Eyewitness misidentification
• Prosecutorial misconduct
• Junk science and flawed forensic methods
• Tunnel-vision investigations ignoring exculpatory evidence
• Ineffective assistance of counsel
• Perjured testimony by informants or cooperating witnesses
• DNA exoneration cases

Michigan ranks among the top states for exonerations nationally, according to the National Registry of Exonerations. Many of those exonerations involve official misconduct — cases where the government did not simply make an error but actively suppressed information, fabricated evidence, or pressured witnesses into providing false testimony.

Michigan and Federal Law for Exonerees

Michigan exonerees have access to both a state compensation statute and federal civil rights claims — a dual track that allows victims to pursue every dollar available under both systems.

Michigan Wrongful Imprisonment Compensation Act (MCL 691.1751 et seq.)
This statute entitles exonerees to $50,000 for each year of wrongful imprisonment in a Michigan correctional facility. To qualify, the claimant must have been convicted of a Michigan crime, served time in a state facility, and had the conviction reversed or vacated on grounds consistent with innocence. Claims are filed in the Michigan Court of Claims. The per-year amount provides a meaningful baseline, but it is rarely adequate to compensate for the full scope of what wrongful imprisonment costs a person over a lifetime.

42 U.S.C. § 1983 — Federal Civil Rights Claims
Section 1983 is the most powerful tool available to wrongful conviction victims. It allows exonerees to sue the individual police officers, detectives, and in certain circumstances prosecutors who caused their wrongful imprisonment. Common constitutional violations in these cases include Brady v. Maryland violations — failure to disclose exculpatory evidence to the defense — fabrication of evidence in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment, coercion of confessions in violation of the Fifth Amendment, and suggestive identification procedures that violate due process. These claims are filed in federal court and can result in substantial compensatory and punitive damages.

Prosecutorial Immunity: What It Covers and What It Doesn't
Prosecutors have absolute immunity for conduct that is "intimately associated with the judicial phase of the criminal process" — their courtroom advocacy, charging decisions, and trial conduct. But that immunity does not extend to investigative conduct. When a prosecutor personally directed officers to fabricate evidence, concealed Brady material before charges were filed, or made misrepresentations to obtain a warrant, that conduct falls outside absolute immunity and is subject to § 1983 liability. Identifying where prosecutorial conduct crosses from protected advocacy into actionable misconduct is one of the most consequential analytical steps in a wrongful conviction case.

Municipal Liability Under Monell
If your wrongful conviction resulted from a department-wide policy, pattern of conduct, or training failure — a police department's systemic failure to document and disclose exculpatory evidence, a history of coerced confessions that leadership knew about and permitted — the municipality itself can be held liable for damages under Monell v. Department of Social Services. Municipal liability expands the pool of recoverable compensation well beyond the personal assets of individual officers.

Statute of Limitations Under Heck v. Humphrey
Federal § 1983 claims in Michigan are subject to a three-year statute of limitations, but the clock starts from the date of exoneration — not the date of conviction. This accrual rule, established by the U.S. Supreme Court in Heck v. Humphrey, means that the limitations period does not begin until your conviction is reversed and the charges against you are dismissed. Despite this favorable rule, building a wrongful conviction case takes significant investigation, and you should contact an attorney as soon as possible after exoneration.

Why Wrongful Conviction Cases Are Different From Standard Civil Rights Claims

A wrongful conviction case is not just a civil rights lawsuit. It is an attempt to reconstruct a criminal investigation that may have occurred years or decades earlier, identify constitutional violations buried in police files the government resisted producing, and hold individual officers and prosecutors personally responsible for conduct they will insist was lawful.

Government defendants fight these cases on every front. Qualified immunity protects individual officers unless the right they violated was clearly established in binding precedent at the time — not just broadly established, but specifically established, in a way that put the officer on clear notice. Overcoming qualified immunity requires identifying binding Sixth Circuit or U.S. Supreme Court precedent that directly addressed the specific conduct at issue. Prosecutors claim absolute immunity for everything connected to their courtroom role. Municipalities deny that any official policy caused the constitutional violation.

The evidence is in the government's files, and the government will resist producing it. We use aggressive federal discovery — depositions of officers, supervisors, and prosecutors; subpoenas for internal affairs records, training files, and disciplinary histories; requests for communications that reveal what was known, when it was known, and what was done with it. Employment records of the detectives involved. Prior complaints from other defendants who were handled the same way. These are the materials that wrongful conviction cases turn on, and they do not surface without attorneys who know exactly what to demand and how to compel production.

Serving Michigan's Wrongfully Convicted

Christopher Trainor & Associates represents Michigan exonerees throughout the state from our offices in White Lake Township and Ann Arbor. We file wrongful conviction civil rights cases in both the Eastern District of Michigan in Detroit and the Western District of Michigan in Grand Rapids, as well as in the Michigan Court of Claims for state compensation proceedings.

Call (248) 886-8650 any time for a free, confidential consultation. If you have been exonerated after a wrongful conviction in Michigan, we want to hear your story. You pay nothing unless we win.