Earlier this year, Florida police officer Nouman Raja was tried in court and convicted of manslaughter in the fatal shooting of a black motorist, Corey Jones. This conviction was welcomed by the grieving family and activists supporting them, as criminal charges against police officers rarely result in a guilty verdict.
Police officers are rarely brought into court for deadly shootings. According to data gathered by a Police Integrity Research Group -- led by Phillip Stinson, a criminal justice professor at Bowling Green State University -- police officers shoot and kill between 900 and 1,000 people per year. This research examined how juries, prosecutors, and judges have tended to react toward police shootings and looks for patterns between these shootings and police arrests that follow.
Stinson elaborated that these shootings are never done under the same set of circumstances, which vary from one case to the next. “I think the best thing that might have come out of the data we’ve been gathering is that people used to think of these shootings as one-offs,” Stinson noted. The research shows that this is clearly not the case.
Their data shed light on the fact that only 35 of the 98 non-federal law enforcement officers that have been arrested since 2005 have been convicted of a crime – usually for offenses like manslaughter or negligent homicide. Only three of those 98 got convicted of murder.
Police officers rarely get a murder conviction because they have a clear understanding of what constitutes a justifiable shooting while they’re on duty. Police academies teach these legal standards in detail, so officers are fully aware of their limits.
What used to be a standard of police officers merely feeling afraid for their lives now has stricter guidelines. Thanks to a 1989 Supreme Court case, Graham v. Connor, objectively reasonable police officers now must believe there to be a lethal and deadly risk before firing their gun.
Additionally, prosecutors are slow to bring charges involving police officer shootings to trial. Prosecutors fear they won’t be able to convince jurors or judges to assess a guilty verdict for police officers or get them to question the officer’s actions while on duty. Many times, prosecutors are voted into office and work with these officers daily. They often feel it’s in their best interest to appease the public by not bringing police officers to court.
In the last couple of years, voters and activists pushing for police accountability have banded together to raise awareness of the role that prosecutors play in charging police officers for misconduct. Because of this effort to hold police officers more accountable, more political candidates have been advocating to reform the legal system and to hold police officers responsible for misconduct.
By 2016, many federal, state, and local offices have been taken by candidates who want closer scrutiny of any illegal activities by police. In Chicago, the state’s attorney, Anita Alverez, was replaced by an activist candidate because she refused to release to the public a tape showing a Chicago police officer who shot and killed victim Laquan McDonald.
Slowly but surely, voters are creating change by coming together to demand that elected officials examine and prosecute police corruption and lawlessness.
Your rights should never be violated. If you’ve been the victim of police misconduct, consult the attorneys at the Michigan Legal Center. We specialize in protecting our clients from all manner of police brutality and misconduct. With more than 20 years of experience and more than $200 million worth of legal cases, we’re here to defend the residents of Michigan.
The attorneys at the Michigan Legal Center are happy to answer any questions and offer advice on the necessary steps to receive compensation after experiencing the consequences of police misconduct. Call 1-800-961-8447 for your free consultation.
